IBM Support

IT36302: VIRTUAL MACHINE BACKUP FAILS AFTER REMOVING THE VM FROM A SLA AND ADDING IT BACK TO THE SAME SLA

Subscribe

You can track all active APARs for this component.

 

APAR status

  • Closed as program error.

Error description

  • Error Description:
    The backup of a Virtual Machine in IBM Spectrum Protect Plus can
    fail if the VM has ever been backed up successfully to an SLA,
    then is removed from this SLA and added to the same SLA again at
    a later stage.
    
    The Joblog will show the backup failure without any further
    detail:
    ERROR,<id>,<time>,,CTGGA2649,Backup of VM <VM-NAME> failed due
     to an unexpected error. Contact support for further assistance.
     Error: Did not find object with key.
    ...
    SUMMARY,<id>,<time>,,CTGGA2384,VM: <VM-NAME>; Proxy: null;
     vSnap(s): vsnap.host.name; Type: Incremental; Transport: null;
     Transferred: null; Throughput: 0 B/s; Queue Time: 0 second;
     Protected VMDKs: 0 of 1; Status: failed
    
    The Virgo log will show the following:
    
    [timestamp] INFO  thread-id1 .. Initializing backup of vm:
    <VM-NAME> (host: esxi.host.name) data center: <DC-NAME>
    [timestamp] INFO  thread-id1 .. VM <VM-NAME> storageMapping key:
    c7de3ce5156c50ea6c8a258bc1fde53b ->
    spp_1070_2153_174696369d1__group9_92
    [timestamp] INFO  thread-id1 .. matched volumeId for disk Hard
    disk 1 for VM <VM-NAME>
    [timestamp] INFO  thread-id1 .. Error in
    ManagedObjectLoaderImpl(). Did not find object with key: <KeyId>
    [timestamp] INFO  thread-id1 .. VMware exception:
    com.catalogic.ecx.serviceprovider.common.hypervisor.exception.Hy
    pervisorObjectNotFoundException: Did not find object with key.
     at
    com.catalogic.ecx.serviceprovider.common.hypervisor.vmware.Manag
    edObjectLoaderImpl.getObject(ManagedObjectLoaderImpl.java:78)
     at
    com.catalogic.ecx.serviceprovider.common.hypervisor.vmware.Vsphe
    reBackupVmUpdaterImpl.getDatacenter(VsphereBackupVmUpdaterImpl.j
    ava:153)
     at
    com.catalogic.ecx.serviceprovider.common.hypervisor.vmware.Vsphe
    reBackupVmUpdaterImpl.toVsphereResult(VsphereBackupVmUpdaterImpl
    .java:337)
     at
    com.catalogic.ecx.serviceprovider.common.hypervisor.vmware.VMwar
    eVirtualMachine.backup(VMwareVirtualMachine.java:1304)
     at
    com.catalogic.ecx.serviceprovider.protection.hypervisor.cbt.CbtB
    ackupWorker.runBackup(CbtBackupWorker.java:595)
     at
    com.catalogic.ecx.serviceprovider.protection.hypervisor.cbt.CbtB
    ackupWorker.call(CbtBackupWorker.java:1076)
     at
    com.catalogic.ecx.serviceprovider.protection.hypervisor.cbt.CbtB
    ackupWorker.call(CbtBackupWorker.java:137)
     at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
     at
    java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExec
    utor.java:1149)
     at
    java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExe
    cutor.java:624)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
    
    The issue happens because the VM was previously protected in the
    same SLA so it had backup results saved in the IBM Spectrum
    Protect Plus catalog.
    When it is added back to the SLA some of that backup result data
    related to these previous backups is no longer matching the
    actual inventory.
    This is confirmed in the Virgo log with the message "Did not
    find object with key: <KeyId>"
    
    IBM Spectrum Protect Plus Versions Affected:
    IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.x
    
    Initial Impact: Medium
    
    Additional Keywords: SPP, SPPlus, TS004928712
    

Local fix

  • Add the VM in a new SLA
    

Problem summary

  • ****************************************************************
    * USERS AFFECTED:                                              *
    * IBM Spectrum Protect Plus level 10.1                         *
    ****************************************************************
    * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         *
    * See Error Description.                                       *
    ****************************************************************
    * RECOMMENDATION:                                              *
    * Apply the fixing level when available. This problem is       *
    * projected to be fixed in IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.8.   *
    * Note that this is subject to change at the discretion of     *
    * IBM.                                                         *
    ****************************************************************
    

Problem conclusion

  • This issue has been fixed by ignoring old, invalid metadata from
    previous backups.
    

Temporary fix

Comments

APAR Information

  • APAR number

    IT36302

  • Reported component name

    SP PLUS

  • Reported component ID

    5737SPLUS

  • Reported release

    A17

  • Status

    CLOSED PER

  • PE

    NoPE

  • HIPER

    NoHIPER

  • Special Attention

    NoSpecatt / Xsystem

  • Submitted date

    2021-03-22

  • Closed date

    2021-03-24

  • Last modified date

    2021-03-24

  • APAR is sysrouted FROM one or more of the following:

  • APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following:

Fix information

  • Fixed component name

    SP PLUS

  • Fixed component ID

    5737SPLUS

Applicable component levels

[{"Business Unit":{"code":"BU058","label":"IBM Infrastructure w\/TPS"},"Product":{"code":"SSNQFQ","label":"IBM Spectrum Protect Plus"},"Platform":[{"code":"PF025","label":"Platform Independent"}],"Version":"A17","Line of Business":{"code":"LOB26","label":"Storage"}}]

Document Information

Modified date:
31 January 2024