APAR status
Closed as user error.
Error description
Problem Details ================== In the problem application I try to hide the status SLAHOLD I use the conditional expression manager to create following expression condition: :status in (select value from synonymdomain where domainid='PROBLEMSTATUS' and maxvalue not in ('SLAHOLD')) Then (from security groups) I add an object restriction (object: Problem, apllication: problem, Type: Qualified) to group everyone. I add the condition that I created. Now when I open the problem application and open the drop-down from the status field, I still see the status SLAHOLD. Application effected ==================== Problem Steps used to reproduced by L2 Support on BS 7118 =================================================== 1. Go to Conditional Expression Manager 2. Create a new condition :status in (select value from synonymdomain where domainid='PROBLEMSTATUS' and maxvalue not in ('SLAHOLD')) 3. Go to Security group ---> add a object restriction against PROBLEM with the condition created against Problem application with type qualified 4. Go to Domain and add the same condition against SLAHOLD status 5. Save changes 6. Log as maxadmin and go to problem and click on the lookup from Status field you will see SLAHOLD which is normal because the condition is not set against MAXADMIN. group/user 7. But now log in as wilson and go to problem and click on the lookup from Status field you will see SLAHOLD which is not normal. Product Version # ================== BS 7118
Local fix
N/A
Problem summary
Problem conclusion
Temporary fix
Comments
step 3. Go to Security group ---> add a object restriction against PROBLEM with the condition created against Problem application with type qualified => this step is making the Problem records with SLAHOLD status to not show. This has nothing to do with what's described in the issue. step 4. Go to Domain and add the same condition against SLAHOLD status the condition's expression is apparently written against a PROBLEM object, not a domain value. Applying a condition like this to a domain value does not make sense. Put these two things aside, this issue is still not a bug. That's because on List tab, there is no actual object available for evaluating an expression. The design decision is that for List tab and Advanced Searches where there is not actual object, we don't consider the conditions associated with domain values.
APAR Information
APAR number
IV02346
Reported component name
SYSTEM CONFIG
Reported component ID
5724R46S1
Reported release
711
Status
CLOSED USE
PE
NoPE
HIPER
NoHIPER
Special Attention
NoSpecatt / Xsystem
Submitted date
2011-06-24
Closed date
2011-08-04
Last modified date
2011-08-04
APAR is sysrouted FROM one or more of the following:
APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following:
Fix information
Applicable component levels
[{"Business Unit":{"code":"BU059","label":"IBM Software w\/o TPS"},"Product":{"code":"SSLKT6","label":"IBM Maximo Asset Management"},"Component":"","ARM Category":[],"Platform":[{"code":"PF025","label":"Platform Independent"}],"Version":"711","Edition":"","Line of Business":{"code":"LOB59","label":"Sustainability Software"}}]
Document Information
Modified date:
04 August 2011